"Criminal History Checks For Stayner Trial Reporters
Seth Rosenfeld, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, February 9, 2001
In an unusual move, court officials have required news reporters -- but
no other members of the public -- to undergo computerized criminal history
checks before covering the trial of Yosemite killer Cary Stayner.
But after media groups questioned the policy yesterday, officials said
they would reconsider it. "We are in the process of re-evaluating that
right now," said court officer Michael Berest.
The fingerprint check was required of reporters who applied to cover
Stayner's trial. He is charged with murdering three park visitors, Carole
Sund, her daughter Juli, and their friend, Silvina Pelosso, in 1999. Court
officials conceded the fingerprint check was unusual, while media
representatives said it made no sense and violated the First Amendment
right to attend a public trial.
Mariposa County court officials told reporters to submit fingerprints to
be checked through the state Department of Justice's crime computer. The
county sheriff would then review their criminal records -- if they had any
-- and decide if they posed a threat to court security. Sheriff's Lt.
Brian Muller said, "They would be issued a press pass, assuming there was
nothing in their background that would cause concern to us."
Muller said not all prior arrests would prove a reporter was dangerous,
though he couldn't specify what kind of record would warrant denial of a
pass. No threats had been made in connection with the trial, he said, but,
"We want to take every step possible to ensure the safety of everyone
involved."
The Stayner case, set for a March preliminary hearing, is the biggest
trial to come to Mariposa County, where the tiny court house rarely uses a
meta detector. Lynn Holton, a spokeswoman for the state Judicial Council,
which sets policy for all state courts, said she knows of no other court
that had required criminal history checks of reporters.
The computer check is a violation of the public's constitutional right to
attend court trials, said Terry Francke of the California First Amendment
Coalition. "In effect, you have to consent to an investigation of your past
life by the government in order to simply get inside the courthouse to
scrutinize the government," said Francke, whose nonprofit Sacramento group
is financed by several newspapers and promotes freedom of information.
Francke said it "just doesn't make any sense" to check reporters but not
other citizens.
Lt. Muller said the checks were required of reporters because they would
have extended access to the trial, while other spectators would be allowed
in only once. Muller said the policy was based on the understanding that
the U.S. District Court had required similar checks of reporters who
covered the prosecution of Stayner last year for decapitating Joie
Armstrong on federal property. He pleaded guilty and is serving a life
sentence.
But federal court official Carol Davis said no checks were done for tha
trial, nor even for the trial of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski. The requirement
became an issue yesterday when the Associated Press lodged the first
protest against it. About 48 other reporters had submitted fingerprints,
said Muller, and so far the resulting records for 16 had been reviewed with
no problems found.
San Francisco Chronicle Managing Editor Jerry Roberts said that one of
the paper's reporters, who faced a deadline today for getting credentials
to cover the trial, had submitted to the fingerprint check. "This is a
clear violation of press freedom by county officials," Roberts said. "We
regret that our reporter was pressured into a background check and will
protest this in the strongest possible terms."